|
In response to
"That's a dumb move for Seattle and him. How are they going to sign anyone else? "
by
Krusty
|
it is not a bad deal for Cano. He is set for 10 lifetimes.
Posted by
groiny (aka groiny)
Dec 6 '13, 08:33
|
It is bad for Seattle, which I think we all know.
They are getting the best 2B in baseball, at 31. He should still be decent at 34, so 3 years of production.
I do not see the need for 10 years, I would be ok with 5 for 130, but the back half of that contract is going to cripple them
|
Responses:
|
