Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 154
In response to
"
Quarterbacks always get long term deals. It's a salary cap management tool. I don't think it's that hard to understand.
"
by
pmb
Really good QBs get long term deals. Cutler doesn't have the team record or personal resume to be regarded as a really good QB.
Posted by
Inigo (aka Inigo)
Jan 2 '14, 08:17
As Jim said, his backup severely outplayed him in the same offense. I'll have to see how much of a signing bonus they gave him, but at first sight this seems like a bad move.
Responses:
He's 56-48 as a starter, 32-19 over the past 4 seasons.
-
David
Jan 2, 08:25
24
Even in the NFC North, a .538 winning percentage doesn't get you in the playoffs.
-
Inigo
Jan 2, 08:29
13
But perennial 11-5 seasons would.
-
David
Jan 2, 08:32
12
The problem I have is that offensive explosion you and others are expecting already happened with McCown at QB.
-
Inigo
Jan 2, 08:41
10
McCown's three best games came against the teams who were 23, 31 and 32 in YPA allowed in 2013.
-
David
Jan 2, 08:54
1
INTs are huge reason why Cutler hasn't yet excelled in the league.
-
Inigo
Jan 2, 09:07
and the question really is, who are you going to bring in who is going to be better? -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:46
see, you can not really look at the QB without looking at what he has around him.
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:43
6
I'm not saying bring in any guy to replace him, but 7 years at a (I'm guessing) high salary is a huge investment.
-
Inigo
Jan 2, 08:54
1
keep in mind, they can pretty much cut him at any point. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:56
'Sup. -- nm
-
Matt Flynn
Jan 2, 08:46
3
2 years ago, Freeman looked like a sure thing. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:47
2
I would've taken Cutler over Freeman any day. -- nm
-
Shaun
Jan 2, 08:49
What a loser he is. -- nm
-
Matt Cassel
Jan 2, 08:48
he is frustrating to watch sometimes, but overall, I take this over Grossman, Orton, Haney, etc..... -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:33
Cutler really does get ripped apart here more than he deserves.
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:26
And that's with offensive lines and that nearly got him killed for most of those years. The bears offense was the best offense they've had since the
-
pmb
Jan 2, 08:26
8
you think they should have brought Urlacher back for one more year?
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:27
7
No question. He would have helped develop Bostic and the other young guys. Even having lost a step or two I don't think guys would have been out of
-
pmb
Jan 2, 08:31
3
and I do think Bostic is going to be good, but he is a year away I think. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:38
1
I think that's probably right. Again, it hurt a lot not having a veteran linebacker in the scheme with the young guys. If Briggs was there all
-
pmb
Jan 2, 08:41
I agree, they bring him back for a bit more than they offerred him.
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:34
I think Urlacher was done but I also think that when they hired an offensive genius, they were ceding the defense some.
-
David
Jan 2, 08:29
2
they said they were going to stick with a similar defense to what they had the last few years
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:30
1
It made absolute sense to do that with their players until they all got injured. I still don't think the scheme is the problem. I think it was
-
pmb
Jan 2, 08:32
His back up really didn't severely outplay him (though McCown played great). But McCown is 34. He would be a short term decision and then its a
-
pmb
Jan 2, 08:24
9
The key is that Jeffery looks like he's going to be better than Marshall, and Marshall is a stud.
-
David
Jan 2, 08:27
8
Things can obviously change, but Marshall has been a great teammate and member of the community since he got here. He has dealt with some significant
-
pmb
Jan 2, 08:29
7
I agree, He has been way better than expected, and he actually seems personable. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:30
6
I will say that I have been very impressed with his public comments twice this year.
-
David
Jan 2, 08:34
5
the four headed monster of Forte, Marshall, Jeffery and M Bennett is going to be fun to watch.
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:37
4
I owe my fantasy success this year to that team. I had Forte, Jeffrey, Bennett and then picked up Cutler/McCown.
-
pmb
Jan 2, 08:40
3
That's brutal because I have no idea why that play wasn't challenged. He was a full yard into the end zone. -- nm
-
David
Jan 2, 08:56
1
uh huh -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:58
yes, finished first with Forte, Bennett Jeffery and Marshall.
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:41
I'll add here that I'm not saying they should have paid McCown. Under no circumstance do I think that.
-
Jim
Jan 2, 08:23
1
Agreed on all counts. -- nm
-
Inigo
Jan 2, 08:24
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.