ST Alpha - "He's 56-48 as a starter, 32-19 over the past 4 seasons. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "Really good QBs get long term deals. Cutler doesn't have the team record or personal resume to be regarded as a really good QB." by Inigo

He's 56-48 as a starter, 32-19 over the past 4 seasons.

Posted by David (aka David) Jan 2 '14, 08:25

McCown is getting far too much credit for shredding the Redskins, the Cowboys, the Vikings and the weakened Packers.

Responses:

Even in the NFC North, a .538 winning percentage doesn't get you in the playoffs. - Inigo Jan 2, 08:29 13
- But perennial 11-5 seasons would. - David Jan 2, 08:32 12
  - The problem I have is that offensive explosion you and others are expecting already happened with McCown at QB. - Inigo Jan 2, 08:41 10
    - McCown's three best games came against the teams who were 23, 31 and 32 in YPA allowed in 2013. - David Jan 2, 08:54 1
      - INTs are huge reason why Cutler hasn't yet excelled in the league. - Inigo Jan 2, 09:07
    - and the question really is, who are you going to bring in who is going to be better? -- nm - groiny Jan 2, 08:46
    - see, you can not really look at the QB without looking at what he has around him. - groiny Jan 2, 08:43 6
      - I'm not saying bring in any guy to replace him, but 7 years at a (I'm guessing) high salary is a huge investment. - Inigo Jan 2, 08:54 1
        
        keep in mind, they can pretty much cut him at any point. nm -- nm - groiny Jan 2, 08:56
      - 'Sup. -- nm - Matt Flynn Jan 2, 08:46 3
        
        2 years ago, Freeman looked like a sure thing. nm -- nm - groiny Jan 2, 08:47 2
        
        I would've taken Cutler over Freeman any day. -- nm - Shaun Jan 2, 08:49
        
        What a loser he is. -- nm - Matt Cassel Jan 2, 08:48
  - he is frustrating to watch sometimes, but overall, I take this over Grossman, Orton, Haney, etc..... -- nm - groiny Jan 2, 08:33
Cutler really does get ripped apart here more than he deserves. - groiny Jan 2, 08:26
And that's with offensive lines and that nearly got him killed for most of those years. The bears offense was the best offense they've had since the - pmb Jan 2, 08:26 8
- you think they should have brought Urlacher back for one more year? - groiny Jan 2, 08:27 7
  - No question. He would have helped develop Bostic and the other young guys. Even having lost a step or two I don't think guys would have been out of - pmb Jan 2, 08:31 3
    - and I do think Bostic is going to be good, but he is a year away I think. nm -- nm - groiny Jan 2, 08:38 1
      - I think that's probably right. Again, it hurt a lot not having a veteran linebacker in the scheme with the young guys. If Briggs was there all - pmb Jan 2, 08:41
    - I agree, they bring him back for a bit more than they offerred him. - groiny Jan 2, 08:34
  - I think Urlacher was done but I also think that when they hired an offensive genius, they were ceding the defense some. - David Jan 2, 08:29 2
    - they said they were going to stick with a similar defense to what they had the last few years - groiny Jan 2, 08:30 1
      - It made absolute sense to do that with their players until they all got injured. I still don't think the scheme is the problem. I think it was - pmb Jan 2, 08:32

Post a message top

He's 56-48 as a starter, 32-19 over the past 4 seasons.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.