Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 154
In response to
"
you think they should have brought Urlacher back for one more year?
"
by
groiny
No question. He would have helped develop Bostic and the other young guys. Even having lost a step or two I don't think guys would have been out of
Posted by
pmb (aka pmb)
Jan 2 '14, 08:31
position so much. Bad gaps in the run game was half the problem.
Responses:
and I do think Bostic is going to be good, but he is a year away I think. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:38
1
I think that's probably right. Again, it hurt a lot not having a veteran linebacker in the scheme with the young guys. If Briggs was there all
-
pmb
Jan 2, 08:41
I agree, they bring him back for a bit more than they offerred him.
-
groiny
Jan 2, 08:34
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.