I wouldn't be surprised if there was a correlation, but not a causation.
Posted by
Dano (aka dano)
Feb 26 '09, 16:26
|
I think it's more about how people eat after 8:00 or whatever time you put on it. For instance, if you eat your three meals before 8:00 and then eat after 8:00 you're naturally eating more calories even if it's irrelevant to when you ate them. Also, eating at that time is likely more often be low quality snacking rather than healthy meal eating.
|
Responses:
- [deleted]
25
-
And wouldn't the corellary be, since I sit in a cube all day doing a fat sack of nothing, to skip breakfast?
-
TFox
Feb 26, 16:46
-
Actually, the best way for humans to eat is how they train diabetics to eat, smaller meals--6 x per day.
-
Trish
Feb 26, 16:45
8
-
One Link -- (link)
-
Dano
Feb 26, 16:37
4
-
it doesn't matter when you eat a 10 lb bag of chips. That's bad behavior regardless of when you do it. -- nm
-
Callisto
Feb 26, 16:35
-
I call bs. If you go work out, you aren't burning the calories you just ate. That isn't how it works.
-
TFox
Feb 26, 16:34
-
The evidence doesn't back that up. It's calories in versus calories out no matter when you eat them. -- nm
-
Dano
Feb 26, 16:33
-
Find the science that supports what you're saying. WW is saying there isn't any. -- nm
-
TWuG
Feb 26, 16:31
6
|