Backboards: 
Posts: 154
In response to "Find the science that supports what you're saying. WW is saying there isn't any. -- nm" by TWuG

they encourage a healthy balance, though.

i think there's something being smushed with the dissenters.

in the end it is calories in/calories out that counts. how those calories are placed throughout the day and metabolic impact and such are different lines of approach or need.

shareyramble ahead:

i've online-tracked everything i've consumed and all non-baseline activity since around halloween 2007; and, though i had tracked in different ways earlier, paying attention to a certain balance of intra-day content and how i need to cycle calories has worked better and in a more lasting way than anything i've ever tried. still slower than a lot of others; but, man, it's given me hope. i've been battling since i was a kidlet, when my over-efficient metabolism kicked-in (i learned along the way that having been a premature baby increased the odds of issues later weight-wise - ugh).

each of us is so different.


Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.