ST Alpha - "did not say that. i would welcome them or anyone in a burka, etc. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 160

did not say that. i would welcome them or anyone in a burka, etc. -- nm

Posted by Ozorkmandias (aka zork) Mar 3 '09, 11:18

(No message)

Responses:

[deleted] 4
- *high-fives zork* -- nm - znufrii, older, no wiser Mar 3, 11:21 3
  - [deleted] 2
    - to tell you the truth - znufrii, older, no wiser Mar 3, 11:23 1
      - what logic? people are individuals, work should be neutral, and the two should be kept as separate as possible. -- nm - Ozorkmandias Mar 3, 11:26
but how does that materially differ from an email? By appearing in your field of vision they are entering your workspace -- nm - Alan More Mar 3, 11:20 7
- an email is communication. If it's not company related, it goes. -- nm - Reagen Mar 3, 11:23 2
  - In theory, sure, but in practice it doesn't always work out that way, and it's not always clear why one type of religious expression (eg attire) - Alan More Mar 3, 11:39 1
    - because email carries the weight of sanction by a company where clothing doesn't. - Reagen Mar 3, 11:42
- that is their person. an email is work and (as Reagen says) should be neutral of these things. -- nm - Ozorkmandias Mar 3, 11:22 3
  - [deleted] 2
    - yes, but the company will do what it thinks is right for its employees and clients. whether someone challenges it in court and is made to change is .. - Ozorkmandias Mar 3, 11:38 1
      - [deleted]

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.