ST Alpha - "$2 million basically doubles the most optimistic estimates of most people I spoke with. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 150

In response to "I'm really disappointed in WB's token release of Veronica Mars." by Inigo

$2 million basically doubles the most optimistic estimates of most people I spoke with. -- nm

Posted by David (aka David) Mar 16 '14, 09:20

(No message)

Responses:

Just because it doubled the lowered expectations of people, doesn't stop it from being a bomb or a release dump. - Inigo Mar 16, 09:26 21
- I am diametrically opposed to your evaluation and fully expect the VM headlines to validate my belief, not yours. -- nm - David Mar 16, 09:33
- It's a $5 million budgeted film that was pre-funded, and had to pay for theater bookings - Reagen Mar 16, 09:31 19
  - See below. Serenity. -- nm - Inigo Mar 16, 09:33 18
    - Firefly had twice the viewership as VM when it was on TV, and was a massive success story on DVD. -- nm - Reagen Mar 16, 09:36 17
      - and the Serenity figures (if you compare only against the TV ratings) get it about 35% of the audience opening weekend - Reagen Mar 16, 09:40 7
        
        In faulting the day and date release, you're admitting WB screwed the theatrical release. - Inigo Mar 16, 09:45 6
        
        "Didn't care"? No. They knew it could make money, what they didn't care about was maximizing money. But a 6500 PSA isn't too bad. -- nm - Beryllium Mar 16, 09:47
        
        day and date was how the film got *made*. -- nm - Reagen Mar 16, 09:46 4
        
        Indeed. WB is not to blame on this point but I feel commended for supporting a theatrical release -- nm - JD Mar 16, 09:49 3
        
        Especially considering they intially approved the deal with a "yeah, sure you'll get the money" deal. - spamlet Mar 16, 10:42
        
        Except they chose this method of release with Rob Thomas. - Inigo Mar 16, 10:06
        
        It's the rare situation where a company put the fans first. -- nm - David Mar 16, 09:57
      - That still doesn't translate to huge marketing campaign for one vs. dump in 300 theatres for another. - Inigo Mar 16, 09:39 8
        
        It wasn't dumped into theaters. That was all the screens they could get. - David Mar 16, 09:52 1
        
        Exactly. WB had to rent the screens from the theater chains. -- nm - Roger More Mar 16, 12:41
        
        all seasons together? That's not a big number. - Reagen Mar 16, 09:44 5
        
        I assume it was the all seasons DVD, but he didn't elaborate. - Inigo Mar 16, 09:46 4
        
        kickstarter program, yes, but that means I got the film *made* in a small part - Reagen Mar 16, 09:50 3
        
        But it's only a success because 80 or 90 k fans paid for the film to be made. - Inigo Mar 16, 09:55 2
        
        They bought the screens which is kind of a big deal for this type of release - JD Mar 16, 09:58 1
        
        Also, Regal and other companies were never going to show this film. Never. They're adamantly against day/date. - Kim Pine Mar 16, 10:02

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.