Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 09:42
2: Nov 27, 18:07
3: Nov 27, 12:04
4: Nov 27, 08:26
5: Nov 26, 18:06
6: Nov 26, 12:05
7: Nov 26, 08:29
8: Nov 25, 18:33
9: Nov 25, 11:12
10: Nov 25, 07:08
11: Nov 24, 13:17
12: Nov 23, 18:13
13: Nov 23, 06:17
14: Nov 22, 13:24
15: Nov 22, 09:09
16: Nov 21, 22:36
17: Nov 21, 14:03
18: Nov 21, 10:18
19: Nov 21, 07:35
20: Nov 20, 15:19
Posts: 155
In response to
"
Didn't expect this: Pat Sajak: “global warming alarmists are unpatriotic racists” -- nm
"
by
MDH
I don't get the racist part. -- nm
Posted by
spamlet
May 20 '14, 14:45
(No message)
Responses:
I think the thought is basically that Europe and America got rich exploiting fossil fuels; but global warming alarmists want to deprive other nations
-
mara
May 20, 15:10
1
I think it's that logic doesn't enter into it.
-
TWuG
May 20, 15:21
Guessing, but global warming is going to affect non-white people in poor countries a lot more than it will affect white people in rich ones.
-
Roger More
May 20, 15:08
2
He's not saying global warming deniers are racist; he's saying global warming alarmists are. -- nm
-
mara
May 20, 15:09
1
Ah, then I got nothing. (But also, global warming deniers are totally racist) -- nm
-
Roger More
May 20, 15:13
Me neither. Is this a reverse racism thing? -- nm
-
Mop (205 lbs)
May 20, 15:01
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
