ST Alpha - "OFFS" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 165

OFFS

Posted by Spawnaldo (aka Spawn) Jul 1 '14, 09:27

This country disgusts me.

Responses:

And this is why I *always tell people they have to vote. (not STers) But they're lazy and don't take any time or responsibility to educate themselves. - Dilva Jul 1, 09:32 23
- If this does not get women to vote, nothing will. - Spawnaldo Jul 1, 09:34 2
  - Not all women are against this ruling - Tyego97 Jul 1, 09:50 1
    - Just the non-stupid ones. -- nm - droidlet Jul 1, 10:01
- [deleted] 19
  - The Executive as well. need to keep people in that office so they can appoint people who don't want to limit access to reproductive health. ffs - Dilva Jul 1, 09:38 18
    - Just to be sure, everyone is still completely free to pay for their own damn reproductive healthcare, right? - Ender Jul 1, 09:42 16
      - [deleted] 6
        
        Oh, somebody suggested this would lead to women not having the right to vote. I thought we were doing ridiculous assertions. -- nm - Ender Jul 1, 09:55 4
        
        "According to my religious beliefs, women shouldn't vote, therefore I should be exempt from allowing my female employees time off to do so." - Hypothetical Employer Jul 1, 10:07 2
        
        Now the world feels better. I was worried I was going to keep agreeing with you. -- nm - droidlet Jul 1, 10:08 1
        
        yeah, I had to do *something* about that... -- nm - znufrii Jul 1, 10:13
        
        [deleted]
        
        But Hobby Lobby pays twice the minimum wage. All on their own!!! -- nm - Jim Jul 1, 09:52
      - as per usual coming from you - that was glib. reproductive health is an important aspect of health care and should be covered. -- nm - Dilva Jul 1, 09:48 1
        
        But sex is baaaaaaaad -- nm - Guigue Jul 1, 09:50
      - "It bears note in this regard that the cost of an IUD is nearly equivalent to a month's full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage." -- nm - David Jul 1, 09:48
      - sure, but why should they have to? - znufrii Jul 1, 09:46 3
        
        And let's be honest. It doesn't fucking offend anyone. It's a way to cut costs. Plain and simple and it's kinda sickening. -- nm - Jim Jul 1, 09:48 1
        
        Oh, I'm sure they are offended, but their offense shouldn't mean they get to ignore established law. -- nm - Inigo Jul 1, 09:54
        
        in other words, how is reproductive healthcare any less important than any other kind of healthcare? -- nm - znufrii Jul 1, 09:48
      - Sure, but why is women's reproductive healthcare singled out as the only thing people insured by their employer have to pay for privately? -- nm - Roger More Jul 1, 09:45 1
        
        It still fascinates me that there is not a heated discussion over Vigara -- nm - amoxy Jul 1, 10:04
    - [deleted]

Post a message top

OFFS

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.