Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 153
In response to
"
You talk like those dollars aren't generated by goods and services.
"
by
TWuG
other countries would fill the void. America would be on a war footing. -- nm
Posted by
Beaker (aka anniebecca)
Jul 8 '14, 12:16
(No message)
Responses:
American consumers won't be spending as much if there's a war. -- nm
-
Roger More
Jul 8, 12:34
Yeah, cause it's that easy to set up a manufacturing base. -- nm
-
TWuG
Jul 8, 12:28
5
so rol over and hsow China your belly? -- nm
-
Beaker
Jul 8, 12:29
4
I exist, you know! -- nm
-
Excluded Middle
Jul 8, 12:32
3
if China attacks America's Pacific Fleet and they don't go 100% balls to the wall after them, they deserve to get steamrolled -- nm
-
Beaker
Jul 8, 12:33
2
The point is that China has a lot to lose from a war with the US, and America has a lot to lose from a war with China.
-
Roger More
Jul 8, 12:47
"yes America I know we just killed thousands of your sailors in our unprovoked attack, but if you could pay us our debt payment that would be great" -- nm
-
Beaker
Jul 8, 12:39
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
