Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 14, 03:50
2: Dec 13, 12:54
3: Dec 13, 08:30
4: Dec 13, 05:28
5: Dec 12, 13:06
6: Dec 12, 08:55
7: Dec 11, 23:59
8: Dec 11, 14:43
9: Dec 11, 11:29
10: Dec 11, 07:59
11: Dec 10, 18:15
12: Dec 10, 12:28
13: Dec 10, 09:30
14: Dec 10, 05:59
15: Dec 9, 17:07
16: Dec 9, 13:47
17: Dec 9, 10:33
18: Dec 9, 07:33
19: Dec 8, 17:50
20: Dec 8, 10:32
Posts: 152
In response to
"
Hobby Lobby momentum, or they just don't want to risk another loss before getting to SCOTUS? -- nm
"
by
znufrii
This has nothing to do with Hobby Lobby -- nm
Posted by
ty97
Jul 9 '14, 12:53
(No message)
Responses:
in legal terms, sure, but in terms of weighing the courts sentiment on "religious freedom" matters? -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 9, 12:56
11
Wouldn't DOMA be the more relevant comparison here? -- nm
-
ty97
Jul 9, 13:02
10
[deleted]
2
I realize what DOMA does (and does not) do. I don't mean to imply that it is actual precedent on this issue.
-
ty97
Jul 9, 13:08
1
[deleted]
Point being: we can't lump the conservatives together on all issues
-
ty97
Jul 9, 13:05
6
[deleted]
[deleted]
4
I think he gets framed as a conservative, but yes I realize he is not lock step by any means.
-
ty97
Jul 9, 13:10
3
because being forced to recognize gay marriage interferes with the religious freedoms of its citizens?
-
znufrii
Jul 9, 13:19
[deleted]
1
my arguments make perfect sense to me! -- nm
-
znufrii
Jul 9, 13:20
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
