Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 23:59
2: Dec 11, 14:43
3: Dec 11, 11:29
4: Dec 11, 07:59
5: Dec 10, 18:15
6: Dec 10, 12:28
7: Dec 10, 09:30
8: Dec 10, 05:59
9: Dec 9, 17:07
10: Dec 9, 13:47
11: Dec 9, 10:33
12: Dec 9, 07:33
13: Dec 8, 17:50
14: Dec 8, 10:32
15: Dec 8, 06:23
16: Dec 7, 16:52
17: Dec 7, 07:17
18: Dec 6, 14:40
19: Dec 6, 10:07
20: Dec 6, 07:32
Posts: 152
In response to
"
I haven't been following... What's the theories on why so low? Feels like it would have had a built in audience considering first was well-received.
"
by
Name Withheld By Request
It's a sequel that no one was clamoring for, even if the original was well-received. -- nm
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka kelly)
Aug 24 '14, 07:38
(No message)
Responses:
Yes, but even uncalled-for sequels can and do well enough from time to time. (see: Amazing Spider, The) -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Aug 24, 08:10
5
That's very different though. It was a reboot aimed at today's teenagers.
-
Roger More
Aug 24, 08:24
4
I would not call a Spider-Man sequel uncalled for, either. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 24, 08:50
3
Yeah, pretty much. A huge franchise is still a huge franchise -- nm
-
con_carne
Aug 24, 09:16
Yeah, there's always a huge audience for a Spider-Man movie -- nm
-
Roger More
Aug 24, 09:01
1
They have all got my $.
-
Spawn
Aug 24, 10:22
This -- nm
-
con_carne
Aug 24, 07:53
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
