ST Alpha - "despite having less yards and TDs and more INTs? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 157

In response to "Has it been mentioned here that Tannehill was the #5 QB last year according to PFF?" by David

despite having less yards and TDs and more INTs? -- nm

Posted by Reagen Aug 29 '14, 08:24

(No message)

Responses:

PFF grades a player based on their individual performance on a play rather than the play's outcome. - David Aug 29, 08:28 5
- OK, but: Miami's supporting cast still sucks. -- nm - Reagen Aug 29, 08:30 4
  - That's the point. In their evaluation, he played at a high level but didn't get any help. -- nm - David Aug 29, 08:37 3
    - Does their system decide that some of the INTs were good passes, just caught by the wrong guy? - Spawn Aug 29, 08:39 2
      - Yes, they do grade on pass accuracy. So, if a receiver were to fall down, his grade would get dinged instead of the QB. -- nm - David Aug 29, 08:41 1
        
        (In other words, they grade the right way.) -- nm - David Aug 29, 08:41
PFF!!! -- nm - Spawn Aug 29, 08:24

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.