Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 160
Or Congress? But until SCOTUS rules on something whatever actions the other branches take are de facto Constitutional. -- nm
Posted by
TWuG
Mar 12 '09, 11:53
(No message)
Responses:
[deleted]
9
*blink*
-
znufrii
Mar 12, 12:05
2
[deleted]
1
and I refuse to comment on whether or not that was just a crafty way of agreeing you without running into a huge "I TOLD YOU SO!" -- nm
-
znufrii
Mar 12, 12:08
What I said is this: Unless SCOTUS finds an action taken by Congress or the President to be unconstitional, then it is de facto Constitutional.
-
TWuG
Mar 12, 12:01
5
[deleted]
4
The same thing that gives Congress the right to say it *is* Constitutional.
-
TWuG
Mar 12, 12:10
3
[deleted]
2
Then we better hope someone with standing takes it before SCOTUS. You dislike signing statements. Full stop. I dislike the manner in which they are
-
TWuG
Mar 12, 12:17
1
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.