Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 154
In response to
"
note, this is for food stamps, not welfare, but number of welfare recipients found with drugs in blood .01% number of cap hill elect BUSTED 2%
"
by
zeitgeist
So....do we test them when they're elected or when they're nominated.
Posted by
Meg (aka Mojave)
Oct 8 '14, 22:54
More time and cost effective to weed them out as nominees, then randomly after elected.
Responses:
treat them like parolees, periodic scheduled and random tests plus inspections of their homes and offices, the only way to be sure and keep us safe -- nm
-
zeitgeist
Oct 8, 23:01
And if they test positive no pork for them. -- nm
-
tobor.2
Oct 8, 22:55
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.