ST Alpha - "but the manufacturing process for them is a waste of resources in comparison" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 176

In response to "zork - reactionary much? cans of air are compressed air, not an aerosol." by colin

but the manufacturing process for them is a waste of resources in comparison

Posted by zork Oct 27 '08, 08:06

react to *this*

:-p

Responses:

why? the can's are metal and completely recyclable. cramming air into a can doesn't do any harm. -- nm - colin Oct 27, 08:07 10
- just MAKING the can, the energy to recycle the can, the fact that probably not every can gets recycled, the cost of buying it when you have a vaccuum - Danger Girl Oct 27, 08:09 7
  - but what about the production of the vacuum? -- nm - decline Oct 27, 08:13 6
    - Won't somebody please think about the children?!?! -- nm - Cuzzin Todd Oct 27, 08:15
    - presumably you're not buying a vaccum just to clean your computer. -- nm - Reagen Oct 27, 08:15 4
      - but anyone using a regular vacuum to clean a computer is not very smart - decline Oct 27, 08:16 3
        
        use the attachments that usually come with it, duh. -- nm - zork Oct 27, 08:18 2
        
        that's equally bad. the suction power of a normal vacuum is way to powerful -- nm - decline Oct 27, 08:19 1
        
        as I said a ways above, they usually have attachement that give a lower airflow -- nm - zork Oct 27, 08:27
- argh, the energy used to make, load, and transport the cans is a waste IMO in this case -- nm - zork Oct 27, 08:08 1
  - Wouldn't having to build/transport a new computer (when you've detroyed yours by "dusting" it) take more? -- nm - Cuzzin Todd Oct 27, 08:10
your face is a waste of resources -- nm - tRuMaN Oct 27, 08:07

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.