Just for comparison's sake, between Panda, Hanley and Seage (last 3 years)
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka JoeMetz)
Nov 24 '14, 10:47
|
Seager == 12.3 WAR.
Panda == 8.1 WAR.
Hanley == 9.6 WAR.
if Hanelly is healthy he's rapidly catches up in the annual ratings.
Panda == he's a 2.5-3.0 WAR player...19mil a year is an overpay. Hanley's 3.2 WAR avearge is maybe an overpay if he's hurt, but that number is already depressed on injury.
Seager... that's a good contract $15mil a year for a 4.0 WAR player....
|
Responses:
|
