Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 159
In response to
"
Just for comparison's sake, between Panda, Hanley and Seage (last 3 years)
"
by
Will Hunting
Hanley is never healthy. nm -- nm
Posted by
groiny (aka groiny)
Nov 24 '14, 10:47
(No message)
Responses:
Right, but 3.2 WAR a year for 18mil is actually right in line with the 6-7mil cost per open-market WAR. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Nov 24, 10:48
5
does not stop the red sox nation from bitching when he misses 50 games because of injury. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Nov 24, 10:49
4
Oh, that's very very likely. But in the list of contracts, I don't consider this bad...just risky.
-
Will Hunting
Nov 24, 10:50
3
it is a gamble, if he were ever healthy for a full season, he could put up Mike Trout offensive numbers. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Nov 24, 10:57
2
I'm just interested to see what happens next. Many around here want Cespedes on the Reds. Cueto or Latos heading to Boston.
-
volnelk
Nov 24, 11:03
Yeah, whereas Panda...at this point, he's slightly better than average
-
Will Hunting
Nov 24, 11:03
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
