Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 12, 08:55
2: Dec 11, 23:59
3: Dec 11, 14:43
4: Dec 11, 11:29
5: Dec 11, 07:59
6: Dec 10, 18:15
7: Dec 10, 12:28
8: Dec 10, 09:30
9: Dec 10, 05:59
10: Dec 9, 17:07
11: Dec 9, 13:47
12: Dec 9, 10:33
13: Dec 9, 07:33
14: Dec 8, 17:50
15: Dec 8, 10:32
16: Dec 8, 06:23
17: Dec 7, 16:52
18: Dec 7, 07:17
19: Dec 6, 14:40
20: Dec 6, 10:07
Posts: 153
In response to
"
What do you think the grand jury has been doing for the past two months? -- nm
"
by
spamlet
Kinda my point. I think theres enough to charge him. -- nm
Posted by
budice
Nov 24 '14, 14:21
(No message)
Responses:
[deleted]
No, it isn't. You say he should be charged so everything could be weighed in court. They're already doing that with a lower evidentiary standard. -- nm
-
spamlet
Nov 24, 14:22
3
I guess the dilemma is I am expressing an opinion and law talking folks want to sink their teeth into taking the high ground on process before judge
-
budice
Nov 24, 14:30
2
What I'm trying to point out is that what you are wanting is already happening.
-
spamlet
Nov 24, 14:47
[deleted]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.