Backboards: 
Posts: 153
In response to "No, it isn't. You say he should be charged so everything could be weighed in court. They're already doing that with a lower evidentiary standard. -- nm" by spamlet

I guess the dilemma is I am expressing an opinion and law talking folks want to sink their teeth into taking the high ground on process before judge

I get that I do. Deadly force looks highly questionable in my mind. Short of some weapon or other threat to the officer. I just dont see anyhing appear. Nothing in testimony or picures to this point.

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.