ST Alpha - "either that, or we're using a freak occurence to imply an increased risk that doesn't actually exist. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 158

In response to "I don't think anyone is blaming her exactly, we're just pointing out that the risk is stronger than one might think. -- nm" by Reagen

either that, or we're using a freak occurence to imply an increased risk that doesn't actually exist. -- nm

Posted by znufrii Mar 18 '09, 07:29

(No message)

Responses:

it's not the like the results are "catastrophic brain injury" or "nothing". - Reagen Mar 18, 07:34 8
- i hit my head two weeks ago. dave and i have been 'discussing' that we should all be wearing helmets next time. yesterday's news just solidified it. -- nm - Andie with the black velvet band Mar 18, 07:36 3
  - you're discussing and he's nodding his head? ;-) -- nm - zork Mar 18, 07:38 2
    - actually the opposite, he wanted me to wear one and i was resisting.... -- nm - Andie with the black velvet band Mar 18, 07:39 1
      - awwww, he cares! -- nm - zork Mar 18, 07:51
- my point is more that she might have had an underlying condition that precipitated the fall and put her at higher risk for injury than a normal skier - znufrii Mar 18, 07:36 3
  - you don't ski, do you? -- nm - Andie with the black velvet band Mar 18, 07:37 2
    - *nodding* - Reagen Mar 18, 07:38
    - like I said, i've only been once. -- nm - znufrii Mar 18, 07:37

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.