ST Alpha - "why not? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 168

In response to "What do you think? Barbie for a 4 year old. Because that's apparently what we got our neice. -- nm" by CQ

why not? -- nm

Posted by TFox Mar 18 '09, 10:50

(No message)

Responses:

a lot of parents are concerned that Barbie gives girls a twisted view of the female body. - loosilu Mar 18, 10:54 8
- Like crash says, if the alternative is Bratz, I'd get my little girl hooked on Barbie as soon as possible. - TFox Mar 18, 10:57 3
  - People used to complain about Barbie way more before Bratz came along. -- nm - loosilu Mar 18, 11:02 2
    - Right, because who could have imagined a toy company would make a "comb the gum out of her hair and wash her sequined thong, twice to be safe" doll? -- nm - TFox Mar 18, 11:04 1
      - wasn't their creator someone who left Mattel? I think I read he used to work on Barbie. -- nm - loosilu Mar 18, 11:05
- word - no female body will inhabit the White House, no matter what Presidential Barbie implies - crash davis Mar 18, 10:56 3
  - I am very disappointed in the lack of flame messages. -- nm - crash davis Mar 18, 11:00 2
    - crash, I'm furious with you! - TFox Mar 18, 11:03 1
      - true, they should just make Boutique Owner Barbie and skip the CEO ones -- nm - crash davis Mar 18, 11:05
well a fatal weakness of Barbie has been exposed in the last few years - crash davis Mar 18, 10:53 1
- [deleted]

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.