Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 10, 18:15
2: Dec 10, 12:28
3: Dec 10, 09:30
4: Dec 10, 05:59
5: Dec 9, 17:07
6: Dec 9, 13:47
7: Dec 9, 10:33
8: Dec 9, 07:33
9: Dec 8, 17:50
10: Dec 8, 10:32
11: Dec 8, 06:23
12: Dec 7, 16:52
13: Dec 7, 07:17
14: Dec 6, 14:40
15: Dec 6, 10:07
16: Dec 6, 07:32
17: Dec 5, 19:48
18: Dec 5, 12:51
19: Dec 5, 10:39
20: Dec 5, 07:07
Posts: 163
Same here. I consider baseball and football to be most easily influenced by coaching.
Posted by
David (aka David)
Dec 11 '14, 13:30
High level basketball and hockey are almost all about talent.
Responses:
But in baseball even the best teams lose 40% of the time. Because even bad teams can have a pitcher who throws a great game or hitter who gets hot.
-
pmb
Dec 11, 13:40
7
I just don't see it as coincidence that Bobby Cox, Joe Torre and Tony LaRussa dominated their peers.
-
David
Dec 11, 13:42
6
Cox was gifted 2.75 first ballot HOF pitchers and half a dozen other HOF hitters....
-
Will Hunting
Dec 11, 13:49
3
Similarly, consider Phil Jackson that took a team the year after Michael Jordan's first retirement to within a bad refs call from going back to the
-
pmb
Dec 11, 13:52
2
I would never use Phil in this conversation becuase I don't think he's that good.
-
Will Hunting
Dec 11, 13:56
1
The Bulls were their own worst enemies until Jackson was hired.
-
tobor.2
Dec 11, 14:07
They weren't coaching the equivalent of the 76ers either. I think those guys are more akin to Phil Jackson than anything in that they had really good
-
pmb
Dec 11, 13:47
this was part of my thinking, too - which sports have mgrs/coaches who really rise above others, over the course of years and not necessarily because
-
b.
Dec 11, 13:46
I disagree strongly on hockey. Schemes and personnel matching (both inter and intra) are huge
-
Reagen
Dec 11, 13:35
9
Hockey seems like the outcome is largely determined by who has the best goalie at the time. -- nm
-
David
Dec 11, 13:36
8
I was reading some hockey metrics that showed that a correlation between coaches that actively tinker with their lines, looking for match-ups, etc.
-
pmb
Dec 11, 13:42
6
But that's the complete opposite of investing advice! -- nm
-
Max
Dec 11, 13:48
5
There are studies that show that women do better at investing than men.
-
tobor.2
Dec 11, 13:52
4
But that's the complete opposite of sports advice! -- nm
-
Max
Dec 11, 14:07
1
Yep. On the other hand tinkering with the line-up doesn't usually incur bank fees. ;) -- nm
-
tobor.2
Dec 11, 14:08
That's okay, men make up for the lost money by working 15% less hours. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Dec 11, 13:58
1
What does that have to do with sports or investing? -- nm
-
tobor.2
Dec 11, 14:07
it's certainly a big element, but there's more to it than that.
-
Reagen
Dec 11, 13:42
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.