ST Alpha - "Why not? If everyone has some retirement savings, it means that less has to come from taxpayers in the future. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 153

In response to "I don't like that it's not optional. -- nm" by Bacon

Why not? If everyone has some retirement savings, it means that less has to come from taxpayers in the future. -- nm

Posted by Roger More (aka rogermore) Jan 5 '15, 17:48

(No message)

Responses:

I agree it's a great idea. But we already have Social Security. That would make it another Social Security. - Bacon Jan 5, 17:51 3
- So they can phase out Social Security? We already paid in. I want that money -- nm - Epiphany Jan 5, 20:04
- Social security is money from taxpayers in the future. -- nm - Roger More Jan 5, 18:06
- it's different from social security. here it's a self-directed investment fund that you contribute to, and retain the full value of, accessible - mafic Jan 5, 18:04

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.