Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 18:10
2: Dec 4, 12:27
3: Dec 4, 09:36
4: Dec 4, 02:38
5: Dec 3, 14:19
6: Dec 3, 11:17
7: Dec 3, 07:33
8: Dec 2, 17:22
9: Dec 2, 11:48
10: Dec 2, 08:21
11: Dec 1, 17:33
12: Dec 1, 11:23
13: Nov 30, 15:54
14: Nov 30, 09:41
15: Nov 29, 16:44
16: Nov 29, 08:01
17: Nov 28, 16:19
18: Nov 28, 09:42
19: Nov 27, 18:07
20: Nov 27, 12:04
Posts: 160
In response to
"
Interesting that Republicans voted against it 87 to 85 -- nm
"
by
DreadPR
For once, the majority of them got it right. -- nm
Posted by
Will Hunting (aka kelly)
Mar 19 '09, 13:11
(No message)
Responses:
Not sure if this will all stand up constitutionally. It seems to me that taxing one person at a different rate than another is asking for legal -- nm
-
trouble. DreadPR
Mar 19, 13:22
5
how is it different than taxing capital gains at a different level than other income? -- nm
-
Reagen
Mar 19, 13:23
4
Because they're not taxing all bonuses at this level, only those for certain companies. -- nm
-
Ender
Mar 19, 13:26
2
Those companies have the distinction of being the recipients of federal tax dollars. They aren't like other companies.
-
TWuG
Mar 19, 13:30
[deleted]
Its a lot more specific right? Its not just all bonuses. Its bonuses paid to employees who work for companies that got TARP ... -- nm
-
trouble. DreadPR
Mar 19, 13:26
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
