ST Alpha - "It's an interesting question, because it's easier to be great for three movies than six than 23. " (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "I think Bond. So many strong films to outweigh the bad. If you're being left alone on a desert island, you're going with Bond." by Loyola

It's an interesting question, because it's easier to be great for three movies than six than 23.

Posted by David (aka David) Jan 29 '15, 12:49

That's why I give Potter the nod. The first two are weak but the next six are incredible.

Responses:

I think #6-8 in Potter are such wasted opportunities, I want to see an American or someone who read the books direct them - Will Hunting Jan 29, 13:26 2
- I think two of those three films wound up in my top 5 for their years of release. - David Jan 29, 13:34 1
  - I think #6 is as tonal a miss as any movie in the last decade. - Will Hunting Jan 29, 14:07
Right. -- nm - Loyola Jan 29, 13:09

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.