Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 14, 17:55
2: Dec 14, 03:50
3: Dec 13, 12:54
4: Dec 13, 08:30
5: Dec 13, 05:28
6: Dec 12, 13:06
7: Dec 12, 08:55
8: Dec 11, 23:59
9: Dec 11, 14:43
10: Dec 11, 11:29
11: Dec 11, 07:59
12: Dec 10, 18:15
13: Dec 10, 12:28
14: Dec 10, 09:30
15: Dec 10, 05:59
16: Dec 9, 17:07
17: Dec 9, 13:47
18: Dec 9, 10:33
19: Dec 9, 07:33
20: Dec 8, 17:50
Posts: 154
In response to
"
I dunno. Why would Iran sign up to a deal if it believes it can be torn up? -- nm
"
by
Roger More
For starters, if they were planning on tearing it up in a couple years anyway. -- nm
Posted by
Ender
Mar 9 '15, 09:02
(No message)
Responses:
By that logic, there would only be a deal if they intended to tear it up. -- nm
-
Roger More
Mar 9, 09:15
That's just silly. They don't need us to undermine it if they intend to anyway. Either side can always tear up a deal. That's why there are
-
pmb
Mar 9, 09:06
2
For the record, my "they" was in reference to the Iranians. -- nm
-
Ender
Mar 9, 09:21
1
I got that. It doesn't change my answer. Whether they are planning on tearing it up later has nothing to do with whether we can't hold up our end.
-
pmb
Mar 9, 09:22
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.