Backboards: 
Posts: 161
In response to "Today's teaching disappointment: dropping a "stacks on stacks on stacks" reference when talking about graphite structure and getting crickets. -- nm" by Reagen

I wouldn't have gotten it either. not the graphite part, that I understand, I'm just not with it anymore. -- nm

I used to be with it, but then they went and changed what it was. now what I'm with isn't it anymore.

Responses:
Post a message   top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.