Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 1, 17:33
2: Dec 1, 11:23
3: Nov 30, 15:54
4: Nov 30, 09:41
5: Nov 29, 16:44
6: Nov 29, 08:01
7: Nov 28, 16:19
8: Nov 28, 09:42
9: Nov 27, 18:07
10: Nov 27, 12:04
11: Nov 27, 08:26
12: Nov 26, 18:06
13: Nov 26, 12:05
14: Nov 26, 08:29
15: Nov 25, 18:33
16: Nov 25, 11:12
17: Nov 25, 07:08
18: Nov 24, 13:17
19: Nov 23, 18:13
20: Nov 23, 06:17
Posts: 151
In response to
"
and Bud Light just got in trouble on twitter..... -- (link)
"
by
Remlik
For me, this falls under the category of "People who WANT to be outraged". -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Mar 17 '15, 13:06
(No message)
Responses:
agreed -- nm
-
Beaker
Mar 17, 13:35
mmhmm. -- nm
-
kelly
Mar 17, 13:17
For those who are actually outraged, sure. But OTOH I have no problem with people mocking Bud for that tweet. -- nm
-
Roger More
Mar 17, 13:14
2
I think the Up for Anything ad campaign is insipid as a slogan but I enjoyed the Warren Sapp and (especially) Pac-Man commercials.
-
David
Mar 17, 13:17
1
It's the kind of tweet Zapp Brannigan would write.
-
Roger More
Mar 17, 13:22
Are you sure it's not about ethics in alcohol journalism? -- nm
-
Qale
Mar 17, 13:13
yup -- nm
-
budice
Mar 17, 13:11
Which is a decent subset of Twitter. Was it Slate who ran that, "What were we outraged about today?" calendar for 2014? This is 2015's entry. -- nm
-
Name Withheld By Request
Mar 17, 13:10
1
the Grantland NHL weekly article does something similar -- nm
-
Beaker
Mar 17, 13:36
yup. -- nm
-
JaxSean
Mar 17, 13:07
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.