ST Alpha - "There were SMU guys in front and behind him. And he only got the ball because the SMU kid was trying to figure out why the whistle blew. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 154

In response to "Not necessarily. that rebound would have been put on and the game wOuld have been tied. -- nm" by jnine

There were SMU guys in front and behind him. And he only got the ball because the SMU kid was trying to figure out why the whistle blew. -- nm

Posted by David (aka David) Mar 19 '15, 14:59

(No message)

Responses:

The guy called for gt had already tipped it, he wasn't getting the rb, the other guy want in position. The only way that isn't out back is if he's - jnine Mar 19, 15:19 9
- SMU shouldn't has been in that position. anyway they were on a 17 - 0 run and had UCLA - eag Mar 19, 15:30 4
  - Then again, UCLA shouldn't have given up 17 unanswered points. -- nm - David Mar 19, 15:45 3
    - UCLA never should have lost the jump ball to start the game and none of this would ever have happened. -- nm - CQ Mar 19, 15:53 1
      - James Naismith shouldnt have invented Basketball and none of ths would have happen -- nm - eag Mar 19, 16:11
    - True - eag Mar 19, 15:53
- The other guy behind him and in front of another SMU player's realistic best case scenario was being able to pass out of a double team. - David Mar 19, 15:24 2
  - Wait, are you the UCLA fan here? - David Mar 19, 15:25 1
    - One of them. Probably the only one who has it on their license plate. -- nm - jnine Mar 19, 15:36
- "wasn't" "put back" -- nm - jnine Mar 19, 15:20
I didn't see the call, but I'm certain it was right and the fact that I have UCLA in the S16 has absolutely nothing to do with my opinion. -- nm - Reagen Mar 19, 15:02

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.