ST Alpha - "I object to shirts! -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to ""And no, the plaintiff and the defendant do NOT need to have a 'Magic Mike dance off" in order for the jury to properly evaluate the case." nm" by ralph wiggum

I object to shirts! -- nm

Posted by Dano (aka dano) Mar 23 '15, 18:21

(No message)

Responses:

Team Jacob -- nm - Qale Mar 23, 18:57
The whole body-covering system is out of order!!! nm - ralph wiggum Mar 23, 18:23 2
- I couldn't understand why "Do you think my client is hot?" wasn't asked during voir dire. -- nm - Dano Mar 23, 18:29 1
  - They don't need to ask if your tongue is hanging out. -- nm - Bacon Mar 23, 18:43
On what grounds? -- nm - Beryllium Mar 23, 18:22 2
- Being naked is more honest. (crossref Spanx) -- nm - budice Mar 23, 18:23 1
  - They do make a point having you take your hat off, I don't see any justification for shirts to be given unfair priviledges in the open court of law -- nm - zeitgeist Mar 23, 18:56

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.