Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 157
In response to
"
Disney To Release Original, Unaltered Cut Of Star Wars Trilogy On Blu-ray -- (link)
"
by
Remlik
And now I'm wondering what "challenges" they encountered. -- nm
Posted by
tobor.2 (aka liioulu)
Apr 7 '15, 19:44
(No message)
Responses:
Movie quality, for one. -- nm
-
David
Apr 7, 19:44
5
this is possible since it is 40 years old and Lucas was interested in the later versions and the changes. the original master could be age damaged -- nm
-
Peglegpete
Apr 7, 20:17
1
Or Lucas screwed them up when he changed them. -- nm
-
tobor.2
Apr 7, 21:19
Less tongue in cheek, I'd guess that the literal version of that statement is among the 'challenges' -- nm
-
JD
Apr 7, 19:46
2
Because the movies aren't good, JD. -- nm
-
David
Apr 7, 20:06
1
The original 3 are better than the next 3. -- nm
-
tobor.2
Apr 7, 21:16
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
