ST Alpha - "plus they give the impression it was since the new trailer, not the original one (at least that was what I thought) -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 152

In response to "you mean an article that is 3/4 a c&p from another site is bad? -- nm" by Beaker

plus they give the impression it was since the new trailer, not the original one (at least that was what I thought) -- nm

Posted by Beaker (aka anniebecca) Apr 19 '15, 12:23

(No message)

Responses:

if you take the 5 year look at it's ticker, this is barely a blip. Disney's on a run for reasons way more in depth than Star Wars. -- nm - Reagen Apr 19, 12:30 9
- 2billion means about $1 per share...and the stock did jump that amount on Thursday. - Will Hunting Apr 19, 13:06 8
  - the movie might not be; but the other stuff (toys, clothes, etc etc) might -- nm - Beaker Apr 19, 13:08 7
    - Realistically, it's another Frozen or slightly more. - Will Hunting Apr 19, 13:18 6
      - Disney's parks and media earn about $36 billion. Everything else in combination is a little over 12. - David Apr 19, 13:30 5
        
        when is the Star Wars section of Hollywood studios supposed to open? -- nm - Beaker Apr 19, 13:40 2
        
        There's no firm date, but these things take a while. We're still two years away from Avatarland, as an example. The current guess is 2019 or so. - David Apr 19, 13:47 1
        
        merci. -- nm - Beaker Apr 19, 13:48
        
        Yep. That's an article without any context. -- nm - Will Hunting Apr 19, 13:35 1
        
        based on the discussion here earlier in the week, I thought the bit on BO projections was worth a post - Beaker Apr 19, 13:41

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.