ST Alpha - "Uhm, the ruling pretty much states it was ongoing for many years." (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 163

In response to "I get why you're so angry. I would be too if it was my team that lost in that circumstance. But you're getting outraged over things that should have" by pmb

Uhm, the ruling pretty much states it was ongoing for many years.

Posted by Spawn May 13 '15, 11:57

And as I mentioned on B2, "... ignorance is no excuse when it comes to protecting the shield". I have NEVER read anywhere that Brady ever complied with the phone.

Am I pissed at New England winning yet another SB the same season they were found guilty of cheating? Hell yeah. It has next to nothing to do with the fact they went through my team to do it. They went through *every* team to do it.

Responses:

I thought I read that they did ultimately get the phone, but apparently not. Doesn't really change my view a lot, but it's something. I think there - pmb May 13, 12:06 2
- Here (Troy Vincent letter to Brady) - Spawn May 13, 12:15
- They gave a lot of options for phone. They did not want him to give it, they wanted him to scroll through and click the relevant so they could be - Spawn May 13, 12:08
Isn't most of the penalty for not cooperating with the investigation rather than the actual "crime"? -- nm - zork May 13, 11:59

Post a message top

Uhm, the ruling pretty much states it was ongoing for many years.

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.