ST Alpha - "So yeah. I honestly wouldn't not have been able to tell you until 30 seconds ago that an intentional header isn't a legal goal in hockey. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 159

So yeah. I honestly wouldn't not have been able to tell you until 30 seconds ago that an intentional header isn't a legal goal in hockey. -- nm

Posted by Reagen May 19 '15, 22:09

(No message)

Responses:

here is the play -- (link) - Beaker May 20, 03:55
If he had hit it up there with the stick, it would have been high-sticking, wouldn't it? -- nm - GregW May 19, 22:59 1
- well above the crossbar, so yeah. if he hadn't made the 'distinct heading motion' it probably would've been fine. -- nm - mafic May 20, 01:06
for those that weren't watching -- (link) - Reagen May 19, 22:21
me too, but that would've been my guess. intentional contact by anything other than the stick, I'd imagine. -- nm - mafic May 19, 22:13
That was uh, different for this sport -- nm - JD May 19, 22:11 2
- I guarantee there was some frantic flipping through the rulebook going on. -- nm - Reagen May 19, 22:13 1
  - (though apparently Pavel Datsyuk did it a couple years ago in a KHL game with similar result) -- nm - mafic May 19, 22:16

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.