Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 164
In response to
"
were they John Carter too? -- nm
"
by
groiny
Yes, I thought Lone Ranger and it went without saying, sorry. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Jun 10 '15, 09:36
(No message)
Responses:
Which is fairly stunning since marketing is usually where Disney is stellar. -- nm
-
pmb
Jun 10, 09:44
1
Not for these types of movies, though. -- nm
-
Spawn
Jun 10, 11:15
John Carter was a failure in marketing, and naming the movie, honestly.
-
groiny
Jun 10, 09:43
2
Biggest failure was the name of the movie. "John Carter of Mars", I mean, c'mon. This ain't your "John Carter of Chicago" movie. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Jun 10, 10:51
1
The sequel will be Agent Carter of Mars -- nm
-
TWuG
Jun 10, 11:05
They really have to be scratching their heads at this point.
-
Spawn
Jun 10, 09:41
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.