Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 154
In response to
"
Your IM means he's the wrong person to put against Hillary. The Republicans need to differentiate, not nominate Kodos. -- nm
"
by
Roger More
I disagree. I think people are inclined not to like Hilary. The best shot the Republicans have is a candidate similar to her rather than a zealot. -- nm
Posted by
David (aka David)
Jun 26 '15, 11:04
(No message)
Responses:
I agree that people are inclined not to like Hillary or the grubbier bits of the Clinton brand - but the solution for Republicans is not to have
-
Roger More
Jun 26, 11:08
3
What I think they need is a tolerable candidate who can seem like a viable choice if Hilary implodes. -- (edited)
-
David
Jun 26, 11:16
2
I think we agree on that, but I don't think Christie is that candidate. He's a time bomb.
-
Roger More
Jun 26, 11:22
1
I agree that Bush is better. Christie's the fallback if the Bush name is too big a hurdle.
-
David
Jun 26, 11:26
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.