Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 2, 17:22
2: Dec 2, 11:48
3: Dec 2, 08:21
4: Dec 1, 17:33
5: Dec 1, 11:23
6: Nov 30, 15:54
7: Nov 30, 09:41
8: Nov 29, 16:44
9: Nov 29, 08:01
10: Nov 28, 16:19
11: Nov 28, 09:42
12: Nov 27, 18:07
13: Nov 27, 12:04
14: Nov 27, 08:26
15: Nov 26, 18:06
16: Nov 26, 12:05
17: Nov 26, 08:29
18: Nov 25, 18:33
19: Nov 25, 11:12
20: Nov 25, 07:08
Posts: 156
So, prohibitions against adoptions by gay singles and gay couples... what's up with that? -- nm
Posted by
Mop (aka rburriel)
Jun 26 '15, 16:57
(No message)
Responses:
jack said on a bb that rulings on that should be next. -- nm
-
b.
Jun 26, 17:04
8
Not if my boss has anything to say about it ...
-
ReluctantCynic
Jun 26, 17:14
7
works for me! go him/that! -- nm
-
b.
Jun 26, 17:18
6
I'm sure there would still be much litigation, even if this bill passed Congress and was signed into law.
-
ReluctantCynic
Jun 26, 17:35
5
I think it will run into the Hobby Lobby rationale when states start letting officials opt out from issuing the licenses on religious grounds -- nm
-
jangles
Jun 26, 18:26
1
I don't think state officials will be allowed to pick and choose what services they offer based on their own religion.
-
TWuG
Jun 26, 18:28
of course. as long as there are lawyers.... (haha). -- nm
-
b.
Jun 26, 17:38
2
*stern glance* -- nm
-
ML
Jun 26, 17:40
1
Prove me wrong, lawyers! Prove me wrong! -- (link)
-
Roger More
Jun 26, 18:46
[youtube]
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
