ST Alpha - "If you heard "under-bum is the new side-boob", would you understand what that is without "under-bum" being defined? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 165

If you heard "under-bum is the new side-boob", would you understand what that is without "under-bum" being defined? -- nm

Posted by Mop (aka rburriel) Jul 10 '15, 14:56

(No message)

Responses:

Yes, but it really is a bad term as the "under-bum" is what you expect to see if you see any part of the bum. The side-boob is not. At least much less - Spawn Jul 10, 15:11 4
- You don't see "under-bum" if you see butt crack. I'm thinking you don't know what under-bum is. -- nm - Mop Jul 10, 15:17 3
  - Also, unlike side boob, under bum rarely looks good. - pmb Jul 10, 15:20 2
    - I've seen very little bad under-bum. -- nm - Mop Jul 10, 15:25 1
      - It's everywhere unfortunately. Too many young women (that really have no business trying to wear it) are wearing it. -- nm - pmb Jul 10, 15:30
Yes, and I think it was first. -- nm - mara Jul 10, 15:03 2
- Really? Seems like you would just call it the bum, and be done. -- nm - Spawn Jul 10, 15:12 1
  - Oh, well, I guess I wasn't talking about the term itself, just the phenomenon. -- nm - mara Jul 10, 15:17
yes. -- nm - b. Jul 10, 14:59

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.