Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 11, 14:43
2: Dec 11, 11:29
3: Dec 11, 07:59
4: Dec 10, 18:15
5: Dec 10, 12:28
6: Dec 10, 09:30
7: Dec 10, 05:59
8: Dec 9, 17:07
9: Dec 9, 13:47
10: Dec 9, 10:33
11: Dec 9, 07:33
12: Dec 8, 17:50
13: Dec 8, 10:32
14: Dec 8, 06:23
15: Dec 7, 16:52
16: Dec 7, 07:17
17: Dec 6, 14:40
18: Dec 6, 10:07
19: Dec 6, 07:32
20: Dec 5, 19:48
Posts: 165
In response to
"
If you heard "under-bum is the new side-boob", would you understand what that is without "under-bum" being defined? -- nm
"
by
Mop
Yes, but it really is a bad term as the "under-bum" is what you expect to see if you see any part of the bum. The side-boob is not. At least much less
Posted by
Spawn
Jul 10 '15, 15:11
... likely.
Responses:
You don't see "under-bum" if you see butt crack. I'm thinking you don't know what under-bum is. -- nm
-
Mop
Jul 10, 15:17
3
Also, unlike side boob, under bum rarely looks good.
-
pmb
Jul 10, 15:20
2
I've seen very little bad under-bum. -- nm
-
Mop
Jul 10, 15:25
1
It's everywhere unfortunately. Too many young women (that really have no business trying to wear it) are wearing it. -- nm
-
pmb
Jul 10, 15:30
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.