Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 3, 14:19
2: Dec 3, 11:17
3: Dec 3, 07:33
4: Dec 2, 17:22
5: Dec 2, 11:48
6: Dec 2, 08:21
7: Dec 1, 17:33
8: Dec 1, 11:23
9: Nov 30, 15:54
10: Nov 30, 09:41
11: Nov 29, 16:44
12: Nov 29, 08:01
13: Nov 28, 16:19
14: Nov 28, 09:42
15: Nov 27, 18:07
16: Nov 27, 12:04
17: Nov 27, 08:26
18: Nov 26, 18:06
19: Nov 26, 12:05
20: Nov 26, 08:29
Posts: 160
In response to
"
Well, first, this deal doesn't keep Iran from developing a nuclear bomb, it, at best delays it. That said, before entering into any deal I would
"
by
IrishStephen
Then you get no deal. And Iran has a bomb in 2 or 3 years. -- nm
Posted by
TWuG
Jul 14 '15, 09:26
(No message)
Responses:
Wha? But I thought all of this talk about Iran being an immediate threat was scaremongering!
-
IrishStephen
Jul 14, 09:34
5
Less snarky response, without mandatory inspections that Iran can't refuse and delay there's no guarantee they still don't have a nuke in 2-3 years.
-
IrishStephen
Jul 14, 09:40
4
If you think that's the deal,then, with respect, you haven't bothered to look at it.
-
TWuG
Jul 14, 09:45
1
Respectfully, I have. They can refuse and delay inspections, and send it to an arbitration board...
-
IrishStephen
Jul 14, 10:12
You don't have to celebrate it. Can you acknowledge that this is probably the most Iran is going to agree to?
-
Inigo
Jul 14, 09:45
1
Sure, but a shit sandwich is still a shit sandwich. -- nm
-
IrishStephen
Jul 14, 10:13
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.
