ST Alpha - "Were these people behind the decision to post or are they leaving in protest? -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 156

In response to "Executive editor Tommy Craggs and editor-in-chief Max Read are resigning from Gawker Media. -- (link)" by ML

Were these people behind the decision to post or are they leaving in protest? -- nm

Posted by David (aka David) Jul 20 '15, 09:06

(No message)

Responses:

Protest of the chief legal counsel taking it down. - Will Hunting Jul 20, 09:10 7
- "But it's jooouuuuurnalismmmmm!", they cry -- nm - ... while falling into the abyss of sensationalism Jul 20, 09:14 5
  - You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means. -- nm - znufrii Jul 20, 09:44
  - Heh. If they think of themselves as journalists, well, even Uwe Boll isn't that deluded about who he is. -- nm* - David Jul 20, 09:15 2
    - Yes, I gather that they ought to be flogged by Woodward and Bernstein for even daring to argue the article was worth writing. -- nm - Beryllium Jul 20, 09:16 1
      - Bernstein maybe. Woodward, enh. -- nm - Reagen Jul 20, 09:19
  - Given how that was handled, I'm not sure they understand journalism. -- nm - Will Hunting Jul 20, 09:14
- idiots.. good. -- nm - colin Jul 20, 09:12
Yes. - ML Jul 20, 09:09
leaving because the post was taken down -- nm - Beaker Jul 20, 09:09 2
- Okay, so that's a good riddance situation if ever there were one. -- nm - David Jul 20, 09:13
- I ... oh. Wow. -- nm - Beryllium Jul 20, 09:12

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.