Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 151
In response to
"
CNN has confirmed that the suspect is alive/has a pulse. -- nm
"
by
MDH
give him a gun, let him finish the job -- nm
Posted by
groiny (aka groiny)
Aug 26 '15, 09:07
(No message)
Responses:
Given all the posts below debating the death penalty - I have to agree with groin on this one. Let him finish the job.
-
Jim
Aug 26, 09:32
No, that's the easy way out. Let him rot in jail. -- nm
-
samara
Aug 26, 09:10
75
This. So this. -- nm
-
Krusty
Aug 26, 09:37
I mostly agree with this, but ... there's going to be a bit of notoriety. That complicates things. -- nm
-
Beryllium
Aug 26, 09:24
2
when's the last time you heard of/thought of Eric Rudolph?
-
ML
Aug 26, 09:26
1
Well, that's a fair point. Probably once in the past year. Twice, if you count reading about the guy who's life got ripped apart with false accusation
-
Beryllium
Aug 26, 09:28
We need more creative punishments. We should deport criminals to regions of countries that still practice cannibalism. -- nm
-
Imperator
Aug 26, 09:23
1
Wall of New York and be done. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:23
I would rather not have him out in 30 years. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Aug 26, 09:13
2
He would never in a million years make parole -- nm
-
ty97
Aug 26, 09:14
1
check back in 30 years.
-
groiny
Aug 26, 09:15
Agree. -- nm
-
Loyola
Aug 26, 09:11
yep
-
ML
Aug 26, 09:10
64
We'll disagree on the last part of your IM.
-
Will Hunting
Aug 26, 09:12
63
The death penalty is pointless. -- nm
-
ty97
Aug 26, 09:14
60
[deleted]
39
I think there is plenty of reasons to be suspicious of the death penalty.
-
Will Hunting
Aug 26, 09:19
31
[deleted]
16
That's what basically happens now. The person in Colorado had to conceal their anti-death penalty stance until the final vote. -- nm
-
spamlet, Reigning Blood Feud Champion
Aug 26, 09:23
15
[deleted]
13
I think the actual punishment should be taken out of the hands of the jury
-
Will Hunting
Aug 26, 09:26
12
[deleted]
4
electing judges boggles my mind -- nm
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:32
I'm not saying these are likely, but I would consider these valid in a 'just' world. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Aug 26, 09:32
2
[deleted]
1
In time, the death penalty is more likely to be abolished than ever fixed -- nm
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:38
The SCOTUS disagrees. They specifically ruled that death penalties have to be handled by juries. -- nm
-
spamlet, Reigning Blood Feud Champion
Aug 26, 09:30
4
[deleted]
He didn't say to exclude them from making the verdict, just the punishment -- nm
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:31
2
Several states did this. SCOTUS ruled it unconstitutional. -- nm
-
spamlet, Reigning Blood Feud Champion
Aug 26, 09:32
1
ah, I see, thanks. -- nm
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:33
*ding*
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:29
this -- nm
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:29
And they should face charges for such. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:24
Exactly. It is not the death penalty, it is the juror that is at fault. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:21
2
But the life/death decision is made by jurors. You can't separate the two. -- nm
-
ty97
Aug 26, 09:22
1
Hence my post about the system. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:22
[deleted]
10
Because of one juror. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:21
9
but that is the point. that is who makes decisions. human error/perspective/objectiveness cannot be removed from the equation. -- nm
-
Andie
Aug 26, 09:23
7
One that concealed their beliefs to get there. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:24
6
i know. but you can't change how humans work. which is why the death penalty cannot be consistently applied. -- nm
-
Andie
Aug 26, 09:27
5
[deleted]
3
Thank you for winning my arguement for me. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:30
2
but, the fact that it does, and can happen, is the point. you can't take it out. -- nm
-
Andie
Aug 26, 09:35
1
I call that a mistrial, then. The fact that one juror can screw up the process does not mean the death penalty is flawed. -- nm*
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:36
It would be somewhat more consistent if capital trials were judge only so that jury biases were excluded. -- nm
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:28
[deleted]
Suspicious of the judicial system, maybe. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:17
6
[deleted]
5
I've said my idea...a special court system where all parties would be certified for capital trials.
-
Will Hunting
Aug 26, 09:24
1
[deleted]
"A well regulated militia, being necessary for the security of a free state" -- nm
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:21
2
*blink* -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 26, 09:23
1
I'm sure there are plenty of yahoos who would love to have those duties
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:25
wrong, the point is to kill people. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Aug 26, 09:14
19
At least you're honest about it. -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 26, 09:18
11
So then, what's the point of killing people? -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 26, 09:21
10
because they add no value to society. They are killers, rapists, etc.... in the extreme cases
-
groiny
Aug 26, 09:25
9
There will always be debate of where the line falls in determining which are extreme cases. There are some people who do something horrible but then m
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:37
Are you saying you support to save money? Because we know it's not the case, the death sentence is more expensive -- nm
-
Guigue
Aug 26, 09:31
1
[deleted]
Yeah, sorry asshat you had your shot at being a member of our society and you blew it big time. Piss off and die. -- nm
-
Shaun
Aug 26, 09:30
2
[deleted]
Past results are no guarantee of future performance -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 26, 09:33
and that first sentence is simply a bridge too far for me.
-
znufrii
Aug 26, 09:30
2
These people lose their right to be a member of society. Death or life in prison, either way, they are out. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:38
1
I don't disagree that they should be taken out of society, spending life in prison is fine by me in that case. -- nm
-
znufrii
Aug 26, 09:41
I believe he means pointless as a deterrent -- nm
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:15
5
So is life in prison. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:16
2
[deleted]
1
There is zero chance of honestly rehabilitating a monster.
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:22
I never once thought the death penalty was a deterrent. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Aug 26, 09:16
1
me either. -- nm
-
Pippy
Aug 26, 09:19
The point is to end people. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:15
I appreciate the sentiment, but would rather not stoop to his level in dealing with him. -- nm
-
TWuG
Aug 26, 09:13
1
We're not stooping to his level. We try him in accordance with our laws, we give him counsel and then -- (edited)
-
Will Hunting
Aug 26, 09:14
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.