Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 28, 16:19
2: Nov 28, 09:42
3: Nov 27, 18:07
4: Nov 27, 12:04
5: Nov 27, 08:26
6: Nov 26, 18:06
7: Nov 26, 12:05
8: Nov 26, 08:29
9: Nov 25, 18:33
10: Nov 25, 11:12
11: Nov 25, 07:08
12: Nov 24, 13:17
13: Nov 23, 18:13
14: Nov 23, 06:17
15: Nov 22, 13:24
16: Nov 22, 09:09
17: Nov 21, 22:36
18: Nov 21, 14:03
19: Nov 21, 10:18
20: Nov 21, 07:35
Posts: 151
In response to
"
but that is the point. that is who makes decisions. human error/perspective/objectiveness cannot be removed from the equation. -- nm
"
by
Andie
One that concealed their beliefs to get there. -- nm
Posted by
Spawn
Aug 26 '15, 09:24
(No message)
Responses:
i know. but you can't change how humans work. which is why the death penalty cannot be consistently applied. -- nm
-
Andie
Aug 26, 09:27
5
[deleted]
3
Thank you for winning my arguement for me. -- nm
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:30
2
but, the fact that it does, and can happen, is the point. you can't take it out. -- nm
-
Andie
Aug 26, 09:35
1
I call that a mistrial, then. The fact that one juror can screw up the process does not mean the death penalty is flawed. -- nm*
-
Spawn
Aug 26, 09:36
It would be somewhat more consistent if capital trials were judge only so that jury biases were excluded. -- nm
-
zork
Aug 26, 09:28
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.