|
In response to
"so, why the retractions? -- nm"
by
Diva
|
cause it could never be proven, and the only reports on it where circumstantial, therefore instead of being sued, places retracted.
Posted by
Truman
Sep 8 '15, 07:44
|
i mean, the entire epsn article today is based on notes from a dead Senator and recollections of others around the events.
its not a court of law, they can make allegations with circumstantial evidence.
|