Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Dec 4, 02:38
2: Dec 3, 14:19
3: Dec 3, 11:17
4: Dec 3, 07:33
5: Dec 2, 17:22
6: Dec 2, 11:48
7: Dec 2, 08:21
8: Dec 1, 17:33
9: Dec 1, 11:23
10: Nov 30, 15:54
11: Nov 30, 09:41
12: Nov 29, 16:44
13: Nov 29, 08:01
14: Nov 28, 16:19
15: Nov 28, 09:42
16: Nov 27, 18:07
17: Nov 27, 12:04
18: Nov 27, 08:26
19: Nov 26, 18:06
20: Nov 26, 12:05
Posts: 156
In response to
"
That's like textbook protected speech, isn't it? -- nm
"
by
Jim
That being said...the dude is still a douchebag. Pay your ticket and shut the fuck up. -- nm
Posted by
Jim (aka Jim)
Sep 15 '15, 12:29
(No message)
Responses:
or do what millions of others do, complain about it online. ;) - -- nm
-
b.
Sep 15, 12:32
16
Damn right. Or, ya know...just suck it up because you know he was speeding.
-
Jim
Sep 15, 12:36
15
I would guess he wasn't going that much over the speed limit, and that's what was up with adding "tyranny" too. -- nm
-
b.
Sep 15, 12:40
5
It's not all that relevant, but the ticket has him at 82 in a 65. -- nm
-
ML
Sep 15, 12:41
4
so, barely speeding. Tyranny is alive in NY! -- nm
-
decline
Sep 15, 12:46
thanks, I was just going to check that. it's relevant because of what Jim said re: his speeding. -- nm
-
b.
Sep 15, 12:42
2
Yeah...17 mph over the limit...what can you possibly have to be pissed at the cops/town for? -- nm
-
Jim
Sep 15, 12:43
1
yah, google said it's known to be a speed trap; but his speed is beyond that annoyance - maybe he wants no limits. (doesn't change my thoughts on the
-
b.
Sep 15, 12:47
He paid the ticket. He didn't interfere with anybody or affect anybody's existence in any way. He exercised his constitutional right to express
-
pmb
Sep 15, 12:39
8
See your definition of harrassed and mine seem to differ here. Making him come to court to settle up his ticket doesn't equal harassment to me. nm
-
Jim
Sep 15, 12:41
7
If it's not harassment, it's close. The only reason the defendant had to come to court was to be told how much he sucks. -- nm
-
Roger More
Sep 15, 13:05
1
it is just another in a long line of examples of someone abusing their authority. nm -- nm
-
groiny
Sep 15, 13:07
Let's take a slightly different hypothetical. You drive through a red light where there's a camera and the camera shows a picture that you have a
-
pmb
Sep 15, 12:51
1
Dude, I completely understand what you're saying...I just don't agree. No big whoop. -- nm
-
Jim
Sep 15, 13:02
Since he paid the ticket, it's harassment. You have the option to plead guilty and pay your ticket. He did that. Making him come to court so he can
-
pmb
Sep 15, 12:46
2
You don't always have the option of pleading guilty and paying the ticket. -- nm
-
Jim
Sep 15, 12:48
1
Unless there is something beyond a moving violation where there is a chance for jail time or the amount of the fine is not fixed, you generally do.
-
pmb
Sep 15, 12:52
Constitutionally protected douchebaggery is still douchebaggery for sure. -- nm
-
ty97
Sep 15, 12:31
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.