ST Alpha - "See your definition of harrassed and mine seem to differ here. Making him come to court to settle up his ticket doesn't equal harassment to me. nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 156

In response to "He paid the ticket. He didn't interfere with anybody or affect anybody's existence in any way. He exercised his constitutional right to express " by pmb

See your definition of harrassed and mine seem to differ here. Making him come to court to settle up his ticket doesn't equal harassment to me. nm

Posted by Jim (aka Jim) Sep 15 '15, 12:41

All the stuff AFTER he came to court most definitely is. But the simple act of making him come to court...I have absolutely no problem with that.

Responses:

If it's not harassment, it's close. The only reason the defendant had to come to court was to be told how much he sucks. -- nm - Roger More Sep 15, 13:05 1
- it is just another in a long line of examples of someone abusing their authority. nm -- nm - groiny Sep 15, 13:07
Let's take a slightly different hypothetical. You drive through a red light where there's a camera and the camera shows a picture that you have a - pmb Sep 15, 12:51 1
- Dude, I completely understand what you're saying...I just don't agree. No big whoop. -- nm - Jim Sep 15, 13:02
Since he paid the ticket, it's harassment. You have the option to plead guilty and pay your ticket. He did that. Making him come to court so he can - pmb Sep 15, 12:46 2
- You don't always have the option of pleading guilty and paying the ticket. -- nm - Jim Sep 15, 12:48 1
  - Unless there is something beyond a moving violation where there is a chance for jail time or the amount of the fine is not fixed, you generally do. - pmb Sep 15, 12:52

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.