ST Alpha - "In other words you're backing my point. -- nm" (Reading a Post)

SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ

Login
Create Account

Search Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...

RSS Feed

Hosting by DigitalOcean

Support ST on Ko-Fi

Down to Post

Backboards:

Posts: 151

In response to "So not before they were nominated. So it isn't really a comparison. -- nm" by tobor.2

In other words you're backing my point. -- nm

Posted by tobor.2 (aka liioulu) Sep 19 '15, 17:28

(No message)

Responses:

Only if you are agreeing with Pixie and me that biden is a bad presidential campaigner. -- nm* - Will Hunting Sep 19, 17:32 6
- Given Hillary's campaign thus far, are you arguing he'd be worse than she has been? - ML Sep 19, 17:43 5
  - She'll barely even win POTUS! -- nm - David Sep 19, 17:51
  - She's been mediocre but started with 65%...he's mediocre and wouldn't. -- nm - Will Hunting Sep 19, 17:50 2
    - All I'm saying is that it takes a special kind of untalent to squander an uncontested race, and she's managed to do it. -- (edited) - ML Sep 19, 17:58 1
      - by definition, once Sanders entered it stopped being uncontested - jangles Sep 19, 18:03
  - well she's no Scott Walker, i'll admit . . . -- nm - jangles Sep 19, 17:44

Post a message top

Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.