Log In
Create Account
SlickerTalk
Search Archives
The Leaderboard
The FAQ
Login
Create Account
Search
Dr. S. Talk
TT/ST Wiki
How Well Do You Know ...
RSS Feed
Hosting by DigitalOcean
Support ST on Ko-Fi
Links Only
50 Results
100 Results
250 Results
500 Results
1000 Results
5000 Results
2 Weeks
2 Months
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
5 Years
All Time
Live
Down to Post
Backboards:
Live
________________
1: Nov 29, 08:01
2: Nov 28, 16:19
3: Nov 28, 09:42
4: Nov 27, 18:07
5: Nov 27, 12:04
6: Nov 27, 08:26
7: Nov 26, 18:06
8: Nov 26, 12:05
9: Nov 26, 08:29
10: Nov 25, 18:33
11: Nov 25, 11:12
12: Nov 25, 07:08
13: Nov 24, 13:17
14: Nov 23, 18:13
15: Nov 23, 06:17
16: Nov 22, 13:24
17: Nov 22, 09:09
18: Nov 21, 22:36
19: Nov 21, 14:03
20: Nov 21, 10:18
Posts: 163
In response to
"
do you own the stock ? -- nm
"
by
decline
No, and now I'm wishing I jumped on it yesterday :) *only* up 30% today. -- nm
Posted by
Meg (aka Mojave)
Oct 20 '15, 13:14
(No message)
Responses:
nothing has changed besides oprah really. maybe some more revenue from her face but aren't their problems brand-related and organizational?
-
fabulous squad
Oct 20, 13:15
15
WW cures cancer! -- nm
-
Dr Oz
Oct 20, 13:31
They do seem to have moved away from the original concept. I actually asked recently when they would
-
Meg
Oct 20, 13:31
8
Information about food and how to eat healthily is easily available, but getting touchy-feely and clubby keeps people in the program -- nm
-
Roger More
Oct 20, 14:07
7
the social/community part, but some of what they've tried has been a turnoff for many - attempts at teaching NLP and other methods by people not
-
b.
Oct 20, 14:27
6
I'm sure plenty of people have been turned off, but maybe those aren't the target customers? (People willing to pay more, and who will stay in the
-
Roger More
Oct 20, 14:48
5
from when I was going regularly and from what I've read online, the changes caused some people who had been going for a long time, sometimes
-
b.
Oct 20, 15:09
4
I hadn't actually read any stories on the Oprah involvement yet, but here is a quickety googled one. it mentions their declines. nm but: -- (link)
-
b.
Oct 20, 15:12
3
Thanks. Interesting to see the problems facing the company in more detail. -- nm
-
Roger More
Oct 20, 15:36
I'm one of the reasons they're tanking. As a lifetime member I don't pay dues, I don't pay for their online tools and I don't buy their products.
-
Meg
Oct 20, 15:20
1
yah, the core program (some notable experimental fails aside) has value*; but they've done -- (edited)
-
b.
Oct 20, 15:26
this may be the best bet, unless she is able to bring major changes to the brand (she did get a board seat) -- nm
-
decline
Oct 20, 13:16
4
one board seat. I mean, how much change can she impact? I don't see great change besides an uptick in enrollments. -- nm
-
fabulous squad
Oct 20, 13:26
3
After the stock gain the last day or two, she could probably kill a few other board members and the next of kin would be cool
-
Will Hunting
Oct 20, 13:34
2
Depends what they're holding it at. It was trading at close to $30 a year ago. -- nm
-
Meg
Oct 20, 13:45
1
Half a loss is better than 80% a loss. -- nm
-
Will Hunting
Oct 20, 13:58
Post a message
top
Replies are disabled on threads older than 7 days.